No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia

Podcast

Non believers in Haiti & Islamic ‘brutality toward rape victims’

Thanks to © Free Thought Radio:

“Nonbelief relief for Haiti and the biblical roots of Islamist brutality toward rape victims will be discussed. Guest Jerry Coyne is professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago, where he speciallizes in evolutionary genetics. His new book, Why Evolution is True, has been much praised by Richard Dawkins, next week’s guest!”

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Tags: , , ,

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010 Evolution, Podcast No Comments

Dan Dennett: Religion shouldn’t be protected class

© Freethought Radio:

This weekend’s show will comment on the Rev. Pat Robertson’s remarks on Haiti and look other imprecatory prayer. The special guest: Philosophy’s best and “Brightest”: Daniel C. Dennett of Tuft University, author of the bestseller about religion, “Breaking the Spell.”

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Or download audio here

Hosted by Dan Barker – in Melbourne this March 12th – 14th for the 2010 Global Atheists Convention. The official website for The Rise of Atheism hosts this biography of Dan:

Dan Barker is co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation and author of Godless: How An Evangelical Preacher Became One of America’s Leading Atheists. Dan became a teenage evangelist at age 15. At 16 he was choir librarian for faith-healer Kathryn Kuhlman’s Los Angeles appearances. He received a degree in Religion from Azusa Pacific University and was ordained to the ministry by the Standard Community Church, California, in 1975. He served as associate pastor at a Friend’s (Quaker) Church, an Assembly of God, and an independent Charismatic church. Dan was a Protestant missionary in Mexico for a total of two years.

———

Tags: , , , , , ,

Autism: genetics, early detection and the ethics of screening newborns

© ABC All In The Mind, Saturday January 23rd, 2010:

News of the largest studies on the genetics of autism to date is out, paving the way for genetic risk testing in the future. And, Australian research suggests autistic behaviours can be detected as early as eight months. So should we be screening newborns for neurological disorders like autism? The ethical debate unfolds on All in the Mind.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download audio here

Natasha Mitchell: And welcome to All in the Mind on ABC Radio National, Natasha Mitchell joining you and great you’re here.
Today, some really compelling science, but also extremely vexing territory: autism, genetics and the ethics of screening babies; not just for autism, but all sorts of neurological disorders, some very rare. How far should we go and on what basis?

Cheryl Dissanayake: Ask yourself, you know, is he looking at me, what’s the quality of that look, what’s it like, is the baby smiling with me, is he following into what I’m pointing out, is he interested in interaction, is he initiating interaction? You look for this range of behaviours and if the baby is not doing all of that then I would certainly be worried and certainly our data is saying, well 81% of those babies are going to have a diagnosis of autism at two.

The public purse is hurt much more by not identifying these children because the cost of each child to the community across their lifetime is huge. If you identify early and act early, the cost further on is much less, because what you’re doing is ensuring that these people are fully participating members of your society that might otherwise not be the case.

Jennifer Kwon: I think that if you really want to be safe about children, you need to do more than just screen for diseases. You need to clearly understand when you have a treatment available, and if you don’t have a good treatment available or you have an imperfect treatment available, you need to be pretty clear with families about the kind of supports that they’ll get after the screening is done. And I think that we can’t really impart on talking about wholesale screening without having a serious commitment to educating the public about the interpretation and the consequences of this screening.

Natasha Mitchell: Paediatric neurologist Jennifer Kwon, with real concerns about the increasing screening in newborns for neurological disorders. And at the head, developmental psychologist Associate Professor Cheryl Dissenayake. She makes the case for picking up on signs of autism much earlier than we are now—in babies as early as six to nine months. That’s the behavioural signs, but what if we could screen newborns genetically for risk of autism, or the autistic spectrum of disorders?

There is a strong genetic story here. If one identical twin is autistic, a sibling has about a 90% chance of being autistic too. But it’s been harder to consistently pin down the specific mutations in our DNA, or gene variants responsible. It’s likely a case of many mutations, some rare, playing small but co-dependent roles. Makes sense given how complex and varied autistic behaviours are.

So now I want you to imagine a child who isn’t talking, is banging their head, who is irritable, doesn’t look you in the eye and imagine zooming in on one brain cell in their frontal lobe and then zooming in again inside the nucleus of that cell to where their DNA is packaged up in tight bundles of chromosomes. That DNA codes for all the important proteins in that part of the brain.

Well two of the largest genetic studies of autism have just been published in the journal Nature and, crucially, the results have been replicated. Professor Hakon Hakonarsen, director of the Center for Applied Genomics at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia led the studies, one of which combed the genomes of almost 11,000 people and 600,000 genetic markers. And one particular region came up strongly—a series of mutations on a stretch of DNA on our 5th chromosome. Most of us have them, but people on the autistic spectrum were more likely to, much more. And it seems they influence how brain cells connect to each other via a key gene in the neighbourhood. Could these molecules be important in autism?

Continues….   Full transcript, audio: ABC

——

Tags: , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010 General, Health, Podcast, Science 3 Comments

Australia’s Religious Right: how we forget

So. A new year and a new decade. Now with Tony Abbott’s conservative front bench line up dragging skeletons from the closet Aussies should be distinctly uneasy. The real question however, is about Rudd.

Is he any better a leader than John Howard? Now that the honeymoon’s over, we can see how skilled Howard was in [excuse me] bitch slapping the theocrats, so Johnny always came out on top. But Rudd has overseen homophobia and bigotry not as tools to ensure he can call in favours, but as policy initiatives. Where Howard danced with the conservatives, Rudd seemingly did – and does – what  they want.

In 2009 for the first time in our nations history we offered “therapy for homosexuality” – via prayer in an arena of public health. That area? Parental fear of immoral behaviour in offspring. Namely drug use – the media staple diet. Not just faith healing, but Sin Stopping. Focus on the Family offer this bigoted archaism in a package of god-fearing conservatism that makes Scientology’s recruitment via Crimanon [prisoners] and Narcanon [drug dependents] look inviting.

I thought I might revisit some old episodes from prior incarnations and wonder…

  • From December 12th, 2007:

The Religious Right in Australia has had a free ride under the previous Howard Government. Largely acknowledged as exploiting Australians ignorance of this dynamic it is not just the average Sport mad Aussie who must take responsibility for the gradual erosion of our lifestyle and the rise of USA Fundamentalism. Kennedy’s April 27th, 1961 Free Press speech is the opening piece to remind us what true leaders sound like.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

In this first of a three part series, Firesnake examines the main scam artists, the true believers, their steady rise and the dangerous game played by “the law and the prophets” Howard, in currying votes and pushing his 1950′s Leave It To Beaver image of our future. Suffice it to say, our new PM, Kevin Rudd, has long noted this unacceptable situation writing on the “hijacking” of values in early 2005. To say we came dangerously close to capitulation to corrupt and controlling zealots who did more to keep Costello out of The Lodge than Howard is a significant understatement.

It’s understandable Bruce and Sharon Oz are – well pretty dumb, when it comes to understanding hundreds of thousands of their neighbours crave biblical values, Book of Revelations observance and a return to middle ages values. Despite the silliness of what can only be described as bigotry, intolerance and intellectual cowardice we in Australia know this puerility as “Family Values”. From Marion Maddox’s review of God Under Howard – the rise of the religious right in Australia [Google Book here]:

Many voters had never heard of the Family First party before the 2004 election. When candidate Steven Fielding won a Victorian Senate seat (due to an ALP preference deal gone wrong), many Australians thought that a far-right, Christian-based morality had suddenly landed in our political system. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Since 1996, John Howard’s Liberal Party has been slowly importing US Christian Right values and our media has barely registered this profound shift in social and public policy. ALP Foreign Affairs spokesman Kevin Rudd recently wrote that the Liberal Party’s newfound message is that if you believe in “family values” and “moral values”, the Coalition is the only party for you. “It is based on the false proposition,” Rudd argued, “that somehow God has become the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Liberal Party.” Separation of church and state, the natural order under secular democracy, is being challenged from within.

It is further understandable because not only is this all done with deceptive skill, but our journalists and media outlets have been profoundly ignorant if not – in the case of Murdoch tabloids – compliant. There are 21 groups who tend to aggressively lobby for government favour in undermining progressive democratic values such as the choice of abortion, stem cell research, gay rights, equal rights for unmarried couples, human rights for refugees, disabled, addicted, immigrant – indeed any marginalised group not perceived to fit behind a picket fence with 1.4 kids and a “stay at home mum”. If it’s not in the bible, it’s not welcome.

And, who did you vote for dear reader – Family First [everybody else second], Howard, Labour or the guys with exponentially rising membership – The Secular Party, arriving to clean up the mess you have allowed to befoul our fine – if Human Rights breaching – economy worshipping nation?

Take this fairly run of the mill aim from Creation Ministries:

“to bring reformation by restoring the foundations of our faith which are contained in the book of Genesis.”

Or Exodus Asia:

“to glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by proclaiming His desire and incredible power to release people from homosexuality.”

Or the innocent sounding Family First Party – better known as almost securing a Senate seat for  ["I can raise the dead"] Mr. Nalliah, who we all know and love for his Holocaust denying antics and racial vilification. Calling Muslims drug dealers and terrorists, claiming casinos are the “Home of Satan”, telling christians to bomb mosques, demanding we close bottle-shops, claiming visits from God and ranting on with fallacious claims to have personally advised Bill Clinton in the rescue of hostages from the Middle East.

So, what do Family First want?

‘… to make sure every piece of legislation helps every Australian family reach their potential’. In practice, the FFP promotes a strong Religious Right agenda, including opposition to school sex education, euthanasia and prostitution, and outspoken support for censorship’.

No surprise then, a member of one of these groups [The Australian Family Association] Bill Muehlenberg who refuses to publish non compliant comments on his own fundamentalist site considers it “fiction”. Readers comments at Online opinion seem to disagree with his views. The AFA is described thusly:
An off-shoot of the Catholic-based National Civic Council founded by Bob Santamaria. Bill Muehlenberg is the main national Spokesperson, but the group also has spokespersons in various States.

Now, one must wonder how here in the land of the Fair Go, we are 2nd in line behind the USA for loopy fruitcakes who also lie, scam and abuse traditional trust in “Christian” faith with tripe like the following, designed to justify why God misread the election result, after a quick visit and the “prophetic message” Nalliah passed onto Howard:

I kept asking the Lord, “DID I GET IT WRONG????…. Around 5.00 am on Sunday morning, I begin to hear the voice of God say, “Why are you so downcast, rise up and fight. The word you received was from Me. Did not I confirm it through many of My servants?

At this point I said, “Lord, why is it when the Body of Christ comes together to pray for rain, You answer our prayers so quickly?? The words from the Lord came to me, “For My people are united when they pray for rain.? At this moment I felt so prompted to read the prophetic word from the Lord regarding the election that I released on 11th August 2007.

As I begin reading the prophetic word from the Lord, I was greatly stirred in my spirit to read the following words that I had stated, “I will boldly declare that PM John Howard will be re-elected in the Nov election – ‘IF THE BODY OF CHRIST UNITES IN PRAYER AND ACTION.’
Again I heard the voice of the Lord, “For My people were not united in prayer and action for this election. If they were, they would have experienced spiritual revival under My freedom reigning in this nation, but now My people have chosen another way. They have not voted for My will, but for self gain and personal change?

› Continue reading

Tags: , , , , ,

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010 Church/State, Podcast, Society 1 Comment

The Great Bus Mystery

Richard Dawkins provides some humorous diversion as he draws upon one of his many talents; bringing life to words.

© The Guardian

Listen to Richard read his contribution to The Atheist’s Guide to Christmas, edited by Ariane Sherine. The book is out now in print, audio and on iTunes. The contributors and editor have donated their full share of the profits to the Terrence Higgins Trust

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Or download audio here

————————-

Tags: , , , , ,

Sunday, December 27th, 2009 General, Humour, Podcast No Comments
 

logo

Check Your Timezone. Select "Australia - Victoria - Melbourne" in the first field. Select your location in the second. Don't forget to select 23/11pm in the hour field. Amaze and astound your friends in a timely fashion.


free debate
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
scarlet a